|
|
| Wednesday 11/18/2009 | Line | $ Line | OU Line | Score | NEW YORK
INDIANA |
|
|
214.5
| 110
Final
103 |
|
|
|
| NEW YORK (1 - 9) at INDIANA (5 - 3) | |
|
|
|  | |
| 507 | NEW YORK | 215 | 216.5 | | 508 | INDIANA | -7.5 | -6.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
|
|
|
 | NEW YORK: Conference: Eastern Division: Atlantic (2008-09: 5th)
2008-09 Regular Season Record: 32-50 SU (-10.2 ML Units), 47-34 ATS
StatFox 2008-09 Ending Outplay Factor Rating: -2.7 (#22 of 30)
StatFox 2009-10 Beginning Power Rating: 94 (#16 of 30)
Offseason Player Movement Additions: PF Jordan Hill, PF Darko Milicic, SG Sun Yue Subtractions: SF Quentin Richardson, PF Chris Wilcox
Projected Starting Lineup: • F David Lee • F Wilson Chandler • C Eddy Curry • G Larry Hughes • G Chris Duhon
2009-10 Outlook While not a playoff season in New York, Knicks' fans had to be pleased with the effort and improvement shown by their team in the first year of the Mike D'Antoni era. His up-tempo style brought a welcomed change to the Garden, as New York finished 4th in the NBA in scoring at 105.2 PPG, and also rewarded their backers with a 47-34 ATS mark. They played particularly well on the road and against the Western Conference, teams that D'Antoni was familiar with from his days in Phoenix. Looking ahead to '09-10, only subtle changes can be found, which should help build continuity, a phrase that had been lost on this franchise for many years prior.
Sportsbook.com odds to win NBA Title: +10000 Regular Season Win Prop: Over/Under 30.5
StatFox Steve's Take:: I like this team a lot more than their rivals across the river the Nets, and feel they are much better than the 2.5 wins that oddsmakers separate them by. OVER. | | INDIANA: Conference: Eastern Division: Central (2008-09: 4th)
2008-09 Regular Season Record: 36-46 SU (-0.6 ML Units), 42-38 ATS
StatFox 2008-09 Ending Outplay Factor Rating: -1.1 (#18 of 30)
StatFox 2009-10 Beginning Power Rating: 98 (#9 of 30)
Offseason Player Movement Additions: PF Tyler Hansbrough, PG Luther Head, SG Dahntay Jones, PF Solomon Jones, PG Earl Watson Subtractions: SG Marquis Daniels, PG Jarrett Jack, C Rasho Nesterovic
Projected Starting Lineup: • F Troy Murphy • F Danny Granger • C Jeff Foster • G Dahntay Jones • G T.J. Ford
2009-10 Outlook Indiana's win totals the last three seasons have been 36, 36, & 35. Talk about consistency. Naturally, oddsmakers peg the Pacers for 34.5 wins in 2009-10, and why not, they haven't made any noteworthy efforts to improve their roster since April, plugging in and taking out only interchangeable parts. It's tough for a team like Indiana to make any noteworthy acquisitions with the limited resources they possess as a small market club. The one thing they can do is improve the defensive effort, as they allowed 106.2 PPG last season, 26th in the league. On a good note, Indiana won eight of its L12 games, signaling a team building in cohesiveness.
Sportsbook.com odds to win NBA Title: +10000 Regular Season Win Prop: Over/Under 34.5
StatFox Steve's Take: There's no real solid reason to go above or below the 34.5 wins, although with the decline of the Central Division, my lean would be OVER. |
|
| One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. Boasting a giant sports bettor customer base, Sportsbook is able to present data that is accurately reflective of public sentiment. This beats other sources that may be mixing sharp AND public opinion, have a much smaller customer base, or simply presenting the opinions of contest players, not bettors. The Betting Trends from Sportsbook show what percentage of bets are on each side of the pointspread or total. The results can be especially valuable in high profile games. This data can be used to profit from. When given the choice, most professional bettors would choose to be on the side of the "house", or that opposite of the betting public. Alternatively, others believe in the theory that there is "strength in numbers". Neither belief is foolproof, but if you follow these Betting Trends for long enough, you’ll surely form your own opinion. |
|
|
| NEW YORK |  (0%) | INDIANA | (100%) |
|  | OVER | (0%) | UNDER | (100%) |
|
| Last Updated: 11/21/2009 2:47:02 AM EST | 
|
|
|
|
| No current opinions available. |
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PA SPORTSTICKER PRO BASKETBALL PREVIEW (NEW YORK-INDIANA) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*Knicks-Pacers Preview* =======================
By NICOLINO DIBENEDETTO STATS Writer
New York (1-9) at Indiana (4-3), 7:00 p.m. EDT
The Indiana Pacers haven't won six consecutive games in more than four years. A visit from the last-place New York Knicks could be just what they need accomplish the feat again.
The surging Pacers look to continue their strong run Wednesday night when they face the Knicks, losers of six in a row.
Indiana (5-3) has failed to reach the playoffs for three consecutive seasons, and an 0-3 start to 2009-10 appeared to signal not much had changed.
The Pacers, though, have reeled since off five consecutive wins, starting with a 101-89 victory at New York (1-9) on Nov. 4. They haven't won six in a row since March 28-April 8, 2005, en route to reaching the Eastern Conference semifinals where they fell to eventual conference champion Detroit.
Indiana took advantage of another hapless Atlantic Division club Tuesday, winning 91-83 at New Jersey to drop the Nets to 0-11.
"After the losses it seems like it's the end of the world, especially when you start 0-3," said Pacers forward Danny Granger, who had 22 points and seven rebounds. "But we stayed with it, got our first win in New York and we haven't looked back since."
Granger is averaging 25.0 points and 8.0 rebounds during the winning streak. He leads Indiana with 24.5 points per game.
Granger's has stepped up while forward-center Troy Murphy (back) and swingman Mike Dunleavy Jr. (knee and hip) are sidelined with injuries. Murphy has missed the last five games while Dunleavy hasn't played this season.
Roy Hibbert has assumed a larger role with Murphy out, averaging 14.5 points, 9.7 rebounds and 2.8 blocks over the last six games. The center had 15 points and a career-high 14 boards against the Knicks on Nov. 4.
The Pacers have won six of the last eight meetings with the Knicks, who are off to the worst 10-game start in their history.
They lost for the sixth time in a row Friday, falling 121-107 to Golden State.
The dreadful start now has New York entertaining the idea of acquiring Allen Iverson off waivers after passing on a chance to sign him last summer.
Iverson, the 2001 league MVP and 10-time All-Star, was released by Memphis on Tuesday after he voiced his displeasure with his role in three games as a reserve.
"We had our little group from last year we wanted to keep together and that was the decision in the summertime, not to disrupt what we had," Knicks coach Mike D'Antoni said. "Now, basketball's fluid and things change every second."
D'Antoni and the Knicks are also focused on next summer's free agents, which will include a number of high profile players. Acquiring Iverson would only mean a commitment for this season.
"I don't think we've changed our philosophy in that we want to be competitive now," D'Antoni said. "We want to do everything we can to win right now, within the framework of keeping 2010 open like we talked about."
The Knicks haven't been very competitive of late, averaging 94.7 points over the last six games after scoring 109.3 during the previous four. They're also 0-3 on the road, where they're getting outscored by an average of 13.0 points.
Al Harrington has been one of the few bright spots for New York, leading the team with 18.9 points per game. He had 22 in the last matchup with Indiana.
|
|
|
|
Play Against - Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (NEW YORK) - revenging a straight up loss vs opponent as a favorite, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(48-20 since 1996.) (70.6%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Against - Underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (NEW YORK) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 100 or more points, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(126-76 since 1996.) (62.4%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Against - Any team (NEW YORK) - cold team - failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(70-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Against - Underdogs (NEW YORK) - cold team - failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(39-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +24.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Against - Road underdogs (NEW YORK) - revenging a straight up loss vs opponent as a favorite, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(60-28 since 1996.) (68.2%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Against - Road underdogs (NEW YORK) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 100 or more points, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(112-66 since 1996.) (62.9%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Against - Road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points (NEW YORK) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 100 or more points, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(80-36 since 1996.) (69%, +40.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play On - Home teams (INDIANA) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after being beaten by the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games.
(53-24 since 1996.) (68.8%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play On - Home teams (INDIANA) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games against opponent after being beaten by the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games.
(41-16 since 1996.) (71.9%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Against - Any team (INDIANA) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a terrible team (<=25%).
(81-44 since 1996.) (64.8%, +32.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play On - Road teams (NEW YORK) - terrible team, winning 25% or less of their games on the season, first half of the season.
(128-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play On - Road teams (NEW YORK) - a terrible team (<=25%) playing a team with a winning record, first half of the season.
(70-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play On - Road teams (NEW YORK) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=48% on the season, averaging 48 or less rebounds/game on the season.
(105-63 since 1996.) (62.5%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play On - Road teams (NEW YORK) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, first half of the season.
(143-92 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +41.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Over - Any team (INDIANA) - in a game involving two poor three point shooting teams (<=33%).
(1116-850 since 1996.) (56.8%, +181 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Any team (INDIANA) - in a game involving two poor three point shooting teams (<=33%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-16.5 TO's).
(80-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +25 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Over - All teams where the total is greater than or equal to 200 (INDIANA) - well rested team - playing 4 or less games in 10 days against opponent extremely well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 7 days.
(99-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Any team (NEW YORK) - extremely well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 7 days, with a losing record.
(156-98 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +48.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Any team (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two poor three point shooting teams (<=33%).
(1116-850 since 1996.) (56.8%, +181 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Any team (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two poor three point shooting teams (<=33%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-16.5 TO's).
(80-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +25 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Over - Any team (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two poor three point shooting teams (<=33%), average ball handling team (14.5-16.5 TO's) against an average pressure defense (14.5-16.5 TO's).
(255-155 since 1996.) (62.2%, +84.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - All teams where the total is greater than or equal to 200 (NEW YORK) - after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, extremely well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 7 days.
(39-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - All teams where the total is greater than or equal to 200 (NEW YORK) - cold team - having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, extremely well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 7 days.
(33-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Road teams where the total is greater than or equal to 210 (NEW YORK) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, horrible rebounding team - outrebounded by opponents by 5+ per game.
(62-33 since 1996.) (65.3%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NEW YORK | 95 | | 36-87 | 41.6% | 8-28 | 27.4% | 15-19 | 80.7% | 49 | 12 | 15 | | INDIANA | 105 | Under | 39-81 | 47.6% | 7-19 | 34.8% | 21-27 | 77.6% | 55 | 12 | 17 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the current spread, won the game straight up, and number of simulations which went over or under the current total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, INDIANA covered the spread 588 times, while NEW YORK covered the spread 412 times.
Edge against the spread=INDIANA | | In 1000 simulated games, INDIANA won the game straight up 730 times, while NEW YORK won 249 times. | In 1000 simulated games, 849 games went under the total, while 151 games went over the total.
Edge against the total=Under |
|
|
|
Potential StatFox Power Trends to watch out for:
|
|
NEW YORK is 26-13 ATS (+11.7 Units) in road games in games where they force 13 to 17 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 101.5, OPPONENT 106.5 |
|
NEW YORK is 95-144 ATS (-63.4 Units) when they make 39% to 42% of their shots in a game since 1996.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.5, OPPONENT 93.6 | NEW YORK is 64-136 ATS (-85.6 Units) when their opponents make 48% to 51% of their shots in a game since 1996.
The average score was NEW YORK 95.3, OPPONENT 102.7 | NEW YORK is 31-74 ATS (-50.4 Units) when they allow 105 to 109 points in a game since 1996.
The average score was NEW YORK 98.2, OPPONENT 106.8 | NEW YORK is 37-58 ATS (-26.8 Units) when they allow 105 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 105.3, OPPONENT 114.5 | INDIANA is 22-8 ATS (+13.2 Units) when they make 48% to 51% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 111.4, OPPONENT 109.2 | INDIANA is 146-81 ATS (+56.9 Units) when their opponents make 39% to 42% of their shots in a game since 1996.
The average score was INDIANA 93.8, OPPONENT 88.4 | INDIANA is 138-81 ATS (+48.9 Units) when their opponents make 25% to 31% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1996.
The average score was INDIANA 96.3, OPPONENT 92.0 | INDIANA is 81-36 ATS (+41.4 Units) when they score 105 to 109 points in a game since 1996.
The average score was INDIANA 106.9, OPPONENT 98.4 | INDIANA is 57-31 ATS (+22.9 Units) when they score 105 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 113.1, OPPONENT 110.3 |
|
NEW YORK is 39-19 OVER (+18.1 Units) when they allow 105 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 108.0, OPPONENT 114.9 |
|
NEW YORK is 17-5 UNDER (+11.5 Units) when they make 39% to 42% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 97.5, OPPONENT 106.1 | NEW YORK is 147-108 UNDER (+28.2 Units) when they attempt 18 to 22 free throws in a game since 1996.
The average score was NEW YORK 92.6, OPPONENT 93.3 | NEW YORK is 10-1 UNDER (+8.9 Units) when they score 93 to 98 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 94.5, OPPONENT 103.5 | INDIANA is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) when their opponents make 39% to 42% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 102.8, OPPONENT 98.3 | INDIANA is 10-1 UNDER (+8.9 Units) when they allow 93 to 98 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 96.1, OPPONENT 95.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NEW YORK | | | | INDIANA | -11 |  |
|
|
|
|
|
NEW YORK is 26-12 ATS (+12.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 103.8, OPPONENT 107.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 13-3 ATS (+9.7 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 107.1, OPPONENT 111.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 13-29 ATS (-18.9 Units) in home games when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) since 1996.
The average score was INDIANA 99.4, OPPONENT 91.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 186-147 OVER (+24.3 Units) versus teams who make 6 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1996.
The average score was NEW YORK 96.5, OPPONENT 99.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 14-3 OVER (+10.7 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 109.5, OPPONENT 106.3 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 158-117 OVER (+29.3 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1996.
The average score was INDIANA 99.8, OPPONENT 94.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW YORK is 13-4 ATS (+8.6 Units) as a road underdog of 6.5 to 12 points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 101.8, OPPONENT 106.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 26-14 ATS (+10.6 Units) in a road game where the total is greater than or equal to 200 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 103.8, OPPONENT 108.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 20-6 ATS (+13.4 Units) in a road game where the total is greater than or equal to 210 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 106.0, OPPONENT 109.9 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 16-5 ATS (+10.5 Units) in road games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1996.
The average score was NEW YORK 101.2, OPPONENT 103.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 35-18 ATS (+15.2 Units) after a game where they allowed a shooting pct. of 55% or higher since 1996.
The average score was NEW YORK 97.1, OPPONENT 96.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 18-8 ATS (+9.2 Units) revenging a home loss vs opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 102.6, OPPONENT 105.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 19-7 ATS (+11.3 Units) in road games revenging a loss where opponent scored 100 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 104.2, OPPONENT 107.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 17-7 ATS (+9.3 Units) after allowing 60 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 102.1, OPPONENT 102.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 82-111 ATS (-40.1 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1996.
The average score was INDIANA 95.3, OPPONENT 94.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 28-14 ATS (+12.6 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 104.7, OPPONENT 103.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 227-184 OVER (+24.6 Units) as an underdog of 3.5 to 9.5 points since 1996.
The average score was NEW YORK 94.4, OPPONENT 98.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 17-5 OVER (+11.5 Units) when playing 4 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 102.8, OPPONENT 108.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 128-96 OVER (+22.4 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 10 or less offensive rebounds since 1996.
The average score was NEW YORK 94.4, OPPONENT 95.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 33-16 OVER (+15.4 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home losses since 1996.
The average score was NEW YORK 98.4, OPPONENT 102.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 86-60 OVER (+20.0 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive home games since 1996.
The average score was NEW YORK 93.3, OPPONENT 97.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 107.9, OPPONENT 108.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 25-14 OVER (+9.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 107.7, OPPONENT 108.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) in road games after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 99.9, OPPONENT 104.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 10-0 UNDER (+10.0 Units) after having lost 8 or more of their last 10 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 98.0, OPPONENT 101.6 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) after allowing 60 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 102.1, OPPONENT 102.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 1-9 | -9.5 | 2-8 | 6-4 | 100.5 | 46.1 | 43.5% | 46.1 | 110.2 | 56.9 | 50.7% | 53.9 | | Road Games | 0-3 | -3 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 93.3 | 39.7 | 39.2% | 49.0 | 106.3 | 57.7 | 46.8% | 59.7 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5.8 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 95.8 | 42.4 | 45.0% | 42.4 | 106.4 | 58.0 | 51.6% | 52.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 100.5 | 46.1 | 38-88 | 43.5% | 8-28 | 29.8% | 16-20 | 80.3% | 46 | 10 | 21 | 23 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 99.1 | 50.4 | 37-80 | 45.9% | 7-18 | 36.1% | 19-25 | 75.1% | 50 | 11 | 20 | 22 | 7 | 15 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 93.3 | 39.7 | 35-88 | 39.2% | 9-30 | 30.0% | 15-19 | 80.4% | 49 | 9 | 20 | 22 | 8 | 16 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 110.2 | 56.9 | 42-83 | 50.7% | 6-18 | 34.8% | 19-25 | 77.7% | 54 | 10 | 21 | 20 | 7 | 17 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 99.3 | 50.7 | 37-81 | 45.9% | 6-18 | 35.4% | 19-25 | 74.9% | 50 | 11 | 20 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 106.3 | 57.7 | 41-88 | 46.8% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 18-23 | 79.7% | 60 | 11 | 20 | 19 | 7 | 17 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 5-3 | +4 | 5-3 | 2-6 | 100.0 | 53.0 | 43.8% | 52.5 | 97.9 | 52.6 | 42.7% | 54.9 | | Home Games | 3-2 | +2.3 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 99.8 | 51.0 | 42.5% | 53.4 | 98.2 | 50.6 | 42.5% | 57.8 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +7.2 | 5-0 | 1-4 | 103.0 | 54.6 | 44.5% | 54.8 | 91.2 | 50.2 | 40.6% | 55.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 100.0 | 53.0 | 36-81 | 43.8% | 6-19 | 32.2% | 23-29 | 77.0% | 52 | 11 | 19 | 25 | 7 | 15 | 8 | | vs opponents surrendering | 99.7 | 50.8 | 37-81 | 45.9% | 6-18 | 34.5% | 19-25 | 75.3% | 51 | 11 | 20 | 22 | 7 | 15 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 99.8 | 51.0 | 35-83 | 42.5% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 23-30 | 76.2% | 53 | 12 | 19 | 26 | 8 | 13 | 10 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 97.9 | 52.6 | 35-83 | 42.7% | 4-14 | 31.6% | 23-30 | 74.8% | 55 | 13 | 18 | 23 | 8 | 16 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 99.9 | 49.9 | 37-81 | 45.9% | 6-17 | 34.2% | 19-25 | 77.1% | 49 | 10 | 20 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 98.2 | 50.6 | 35-82 | 42.5% | 4-13 | 32.3% | 24-34 | 72.6% | 58 | 13 | 17 | 22 | 7 | 16 | 6 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: NEW YORK 95.1, INDIANA 95.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10/28/2009 | @ MIAMI | 93-115 | L | 5 | L | 206 | O | 33-87 | 37.9% | 45 | 13 | 47-83 | 56.6% | 52 | 16 | | 10/30/2009 | @ CHARLOTTE | 100-102 | L | 1.5 | L | 195 | O | 38-98 | 38.8% | 60 | 17 | 35-92 | 38.0% | 67 | 15 | | 10/31/2009 | PHILADELPHIA | 127-141 | L | 2 | L | 206 | O | 47-99 | 47.5% | 39 | 13 | 51-84 | 60.7% | 57 | 16 | | 11/2/2009 | NEW ORLEANS | 117-111 | W | 3 | W | 203 | O | 43-93 | 46.2% | 55 | 9 | 42-86 | 48.8% | 45 | 11 | | 11/4/2009 | INDIANA | 89-101 | L | -5 | L | 223.5 | U | 34-86 | 39.5% | 50 | 18 | 38-82 | 46.3% | 58 | 21 | | 11/6/2009 | CLEVELAND | 91-100 | L | 7.5 | L | 201.5 | U | 36-81 | 44.4% | 38 | 16 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 50 | 21 | | 11/7/2009 | @ MILWAUKEE | 87-102 | L | 4 | L | 195.5 | U | 33-80 | 41.2% | 42 | 17 | 41-88 | 46.6% | 60 | 19 | | 11/9/2009 | UTAH | 93-95 | L | 5.5 | W | 210.5 | U | 35-81 | 43.2% | 46 | 10 | 37-81 | 45.7% | 59 | 19 | | 11/11/2009 | ATLANTA | 101-114 | L | 5 | L | 208 | O | 40-85 | 47.1% | 45 | 16 | 44-81 | 54.3% | 43 | 15 | | 11/13/2009 | GOLDEN STATE | 107-121 | L | -4 | L | 225.5 | O | 42-86 | 48.8% | 41 | 21 | 49-84 | 58.3% | 48 | 15 | | 11/18/2009 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/21/2009 | @ NEW JERSEY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/22/2009 | BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2009 | @ LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/25/2009 | @ SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/27/2009 | @ DENVER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/29/2009 | ORLANDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/1/2009 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/2/2009 | @ ORLANDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/4/2009 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10/28/2009 | @ ATLANTA | 109-120 | L | 7.5 | L | 205 | O | 39-73 | 53.4% | 46 | 25 | 46-87 | 52.9% | 41 | 10 | | 10/30/2009 | MIAMI | 83-96 | L | -1.5 | L | 213 | U | 29-79 | 36.7% | 49 | 14 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 56 | 15 | | 11/3/2009 | DENVER | 93-111 | L | 4.5 | L | 224 | U | 36-91 | 39.6% | 51 | 14 | 35-82 | 42.7% | 65 | 18 | | 11/4/2009 | @ NEW YORK | 101-89 | W | 5 | W | 223.5 | U | 38-82 | 46.3% | 58 | 21 | 34-86 | 39.5% | 50 | 18 | | 11/6/2009 | WASHINGTON | 102-86 | W | -1.5 | W | 209 | U | 34-85 | 40.0% | 64 | 11 | 33-84 | 39.3% | 58 | 19 | | 11/11/2009 | GOLDEN STATE | 108-94 | W | -5.5 | W | 225 | U | 38-85 | 44.7% | 63 | 18 | 37-92 | 40.2% | 56 | 13 | | 11/14/2009 | BOSTON | 113-104 | W | 7.5 | W | 188.5 | O | 40-76 | 52.6% | 40 | 8 | 39-82 | 47.6% | 54 | 14 | | 11/17/2009 | @ NEW JERSEY | 91-83 | W | -3 | W | 189.5 | U | 31-79 | 39.2% | 49 | 13 | 29-80 | 36.2% | 59 | 18 | | 11/18/2009 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/20/2009 | CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/22/2009 | @ CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2009 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/25/2009 | LA CLIPPERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/27/2009 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/30/2009 | @ GOLDEN STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/2/2009 | @ SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/4/2009 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| INDIANA is 39-25 against the spread versus NEW YORK since 1996 | | INDIANA is 39-26 straight up against NEW YORK since 1996 | | 35 of 65 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| INDIANA is 7-1 against the spread versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons | | INDIANA is 6-2 straight up against NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 8 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| INDIANA is 20-12 against the spread versus NEW YORK since 1996 | | INDIANA is 25-8 straight up against NEW YORK since 1996 | | 19 of 33 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| INDIANA is 2-1 against the spread versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons | | INDIANA is 2-1 straight up against NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/04/2009 | INDIANA | 101 | 223.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 38-82 | 46.3% | 5-21 | 23.8% | 20-28 | 71.4% | 58 | 13 | 21 | | | NEW YORK | 89 | -5 | Under | 56 | 34-86 | 39.5% | 7-26 | 26.9% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 50 | 13 | 18 | 02/23/2009 | INDIANA | 119 | 225.5 | ATS | 51 | 43-94 | 45.7% | 8-26 | 30.8% | 25-34 | 73.5% | 66 | 13 | 19 | | | NEW YORK | 123 | -7.5 | SU Over | 51 | 42-96 | 43.7% | 9-28 | 32.1% | 30-44 | 68.2% | 62 | 17 | 11 | 01/31/2009 | NEW YORK | 122 | 226 | SU ATS | 67 | 46-94 | 48.9% | 15-34 | 44.1% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 61 | 10 | 12 | | | INDIANA | 113 | -4 | Over | 55 | 42-100 | 42.0% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 21-25 | 84.0% | 55 | 15 | 12 | 01/02/2009 | INDIANA | 105 | 227.5 | SU ATS | 53 | 37-83 | 44.6% | 9-22 | 40.9% | 22-26 | 84.6% | 52 | 9 | 19 | | | NEW YORK | 103 | -2.5 | Under | 44 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 55 | 12 | 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
D'Antoni is 161-120 ATS (+29.0 Units) in road games in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 104.2, OPPONENT 104.7 - (Rating = 0*) | D'Antoni is 124-91 ATS (+23.9 Units) in a road game where the total is greater than or equal to 200 in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 107.8, OPPONENT 107.0 - (Rating = 0*) | D'Antoni is 20-6 ATS (+13.4 Units) in a road game where the total is greater than or equal to 210 as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 106.0, OPPONENT 109.9 - (Rating = 2*) | D'Antoni is 52-31 ATS (+17.9 Units) in road games first half of the season in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 105.9, OPPONENT 103.6 - (Rating = 0*) | D'Antoni is 35-19 ATS (+14.1 Units) in road games when playing 4 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 106.4, OPPONENT 105.0 - (Rating = 0*) | D'Antoni is 46-21 ATS (+22.9 Units) in road games when playing 6 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 108.1, OPPONENT 105.3 - (Rating = 2*) | D'Antoni is 25-9 ATS (+15.1 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 105.7, OPPONENT 101.4 - (Rating = 1*) | D'Antoni is 57-33 ATS (+20.7 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 105.7, OPPONENT 105.4 - (Rating = 1*) | D'Antoni is 77-52 ATS (+19.8 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 106.3, OPPONENT 103.8 - (Rating = 0*) | D'Antoni is 40-17 ATS (+21.3 Units) in road games revenging a straight up loss vs opponent as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 105.5, OPPONENT 103.9 - (Rating = 2*) | D'Antoni is 42-24 ATS (+15.6 Units) revenging a straight up loss vs opponent as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 105.5, OPPONENT 103.7 - (Rating = 0*) | D'Antoni is 47-28 ATS (+16.2 Units) in road games revenging a home loss vs opponent in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 101.7, OPPONENT 104.1 - (Rating = 0*) | D'Antoni is 80-45 ATS (+30.5 Units) in road games revenging a loss vs opponent in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 101.6, OPPONENT 103.8 - (Rating = 1*) | D'Antoni is 19-7 ATS (+11.3 Units) in road games revenging a loss where opponent scored 100 or more points as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 104.2, OPPONENT 107.6 - (Rating = 1*) | D'Antoni is 53-32 ATS (+17.8 Units) in road games revenging a same season loss vs opponent in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 101.4, OPPONENT 104.1 - (Rating = 0*) | D'Antoni is 67-40 ATS (+23.0 Units) in road games after allowing 100 points or more 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 106.3, OPPONENT 105.6 - (Rating = 1*) | D'Antoni is 39-21 ATS (+15.9 Units) in road games after allowing 105 points or more 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 105.5, OPPONENT 104.6 - (Rating = 0*) | D'Antoni is 52-30 ATS (+19.0 Units) in road games after allowing 110 points or more in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 104.1, OPPONENT 104.3 - (Rating = 1*) | D'Antoni is 58-37 ATS (+17.3 Units) after allowing 60 points or more in the first half last game in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 105.5, OPPONENT 101.8 - (Rating = 0*) | D'Antoni is 46-26 ATS (+17.4 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 100 points or less in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 109.7, OPPONENT 107.0 - (Rating = 0*) | D'Antoni is 94-66 ATS (+21.4 Units) in road games after a combined score of 205 points or more in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 106.9, OPPONENT 106.0 - (Rating = 0*) | D'Antoni is 104-73 ATS (+23.7 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 107.1, OPPONENT 105.5 - (Rating = 0*) | D'Antoni is 24-8 ATS (+15.2 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive home games in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 110.3, OPPONENT 108.9 - (Rating = 1*) | D'Antoni is 86-48 ATS (+33.2 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 104.5, OPPONENT 103.5 - (Rating = 1*) | D'Antoni is 43-20 ATS (+21.0 Units) in road games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 103.1, OPPONENT 102.8 - (Rating = 1*) | D'Antoni is 37-18 ATS (+17.2 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 98.1, OPPONENT 102.4 - (Rating = 1*) | D'Antoni is 19-7 ATS (+11.3 Units) in road games after 3 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 98.1, OPPONENT 102.3 - (Rating = 0*) | D'Antoni is 26-12 ATS (+12.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 103.8, OPPONENT 107.5 - (Rating = 1*) | D'Antoni is 54-31 ATS (+19.9 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 18 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 106.0, OPPONENT 106.0 - (Rating = 1*) | D'Antoni is 130-95 ATS (+25.5 Units) versus teams who make 6 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 107.2, OPPONENT 104.7 - (Rating = 0*) | D'Antoni is 54-32 ATS (+18.8 Units) in road games versus poor passing teams, averaging <=20 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 105.5, OPPONENT 103.6 - (Rating = 0*) | D'Antoni is 74-42 ATS (+27.8 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 106.2, OPPONENT 105.6 - (Rating = 1*) | D'Antoni is 13-3 ATS (+9.7 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 107.1, OPPONENT 111.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
O'Brien is 26-13 OVER (+11.7 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 107.0, OPPONENT 108.5 - (Rating = 0*) | O'Brien is 22-8 OVER (+13.2 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 108.7, OPPONENT 105.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
D'Antoni is 10-0 UNDER (+10.0 Units) after having lost 8 or more of their last 10 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 98.0, OPPONENT 101.6 - (Rating = 2*) | D'Antoni is 35-19 UNDER (+14.1 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was D'Antoni 98.1, OPPONENT 102.4 - (Rating = 0*) | O'Brien is 95-66 UNDER (+22.4 Units) versus teams who make 6 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was O'Brien 99.0, OPPONENT 101.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Since 1996, the home favorite has covered the spread 270 times, while the road underdog covered the spread 257 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite has covered the spread 48 times, while the road underdog covered the spread 34 times. | | Since 1996, the home favorite won the game straight up 401 times, while the road underdog won straight up 143 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 64 times, while the road underdog won straight up 20 times. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Since 1996, 15 games went under the total, while 13 games went over the total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 10 games went under the total, while 6 games went over the total. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Since 1996, the road underdog has covered the spread 7 times, while the home favorite covered the spread 5 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog has covered the spread 4 times, while the home favorite covered the spread 2 times. | | Since 1996, the home favorite won the game straight up 9 times, while the road underdog won straight up 3 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 3 times, while the road underdog won straight up 3 times. | | Since 1996, 8 games went over the total, while 4 games went under the total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 4 games went over the total, while 2 games went under the total. |
|
|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in NEW YORK games 51.4% of the time since 1996. (443-419) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in NEW YORK games 52.1% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (73-67) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in INDIANA games 48.8% of the time since 1996. (422-443) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in INDIANA games 53.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (73-64) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in NEW YORK games 50.9% of the time since 1996. (477-460) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in NEW YORK games 44.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (71-89) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in INDIANA games 51.2% of the time since 1996. (490-467) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in INDIANA games 53.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (81-71) | |
|
|
|
|
| [C] 11/18/2009 - Eddy Curry is upgraded to probable Wednesday vs. Indiana ( Knee ) | |
| [F] 10/15/2009 - Mike Dunleavy out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [C] 11/01/2009 - Jeff Foster hopes to play Friday vs.Cleveland or Sunday vs. Charlotte ( Ankle ) | | [F] 11/17/2009 - Troy Murphy "?" Wednesday vs. New York ( Back ) | | [G] 11/14/2009 - Travis Diener out indefinitely ( Toe ) |
|
|
|
| Last Updated: 11/21/2009 2:47:01 AM EST |
|
|
BETTING TRENDS
