|
|
| Sunday 1/3/2010 | Line | $ Line | OU Line | Score | BALTIMORE
OAKLAND |
|
|
39.5
| 21
Final
13 |
|
|
|
| BALTIMORE (8 - 7) at OAKLAND (5 - 10) | |
|
|
|  | |
| 327 | BALTIMORE | -10 | -10.5 | | 328 | OAKLAND | 38 | 38 |
|
|
|  | |
|
|
|
| One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. Boasting a giant sports bettor customer base, Sportsbook is able to present data that is accurately reflective of public sentiment. This beats other sources that may be mixing sharp AND public opinion, have a much smaller customer base, or simply presenting the opinions of contest players, not bettors. The Betting Trends from Sportsbook show what percentage of bets are on each side of the pointspread or total. The results can be especially valuable in high profile games. This data can be used to profit from. When given the choice, most professional bettors would choose to be on the side of the "house", or that opposite of the betting public. Alternatively, others believe in the theory that there is "strength in numbers". Neither belief is foolproof, but if you follow these Betting Trends for long enough, you’ll surely form your own opinion. |
|
|
| BALTIMORE |  (100%) | OAKLAND | (0%) |
|  | OVER | (100%) | UNDER | (0%) |
|
| Last Updated: 2/9/2010 1:28:27 AM EST | 
|
|
|
|
| No current opinions available. |
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PA SPORTSTICKER PRO FOOTBALL PREVIEW (BALTIMORE-OAKLAND) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*Ravens-Raiders Preview* ========================
By BRETT HUSTON STATS Writer
Mistakes were prevalent as the Baltimore Ravens let one opportunity to clinch a wild-card spot slip away, but there's a second chance awaiting them Sunday when they visit an opponent whose playoff hopes were dashed long ago.
The Oakland Raiders, however, have acquitted themselves rather well against the AFC North's other postseason contenders.
It's win and in for the Ravens when they visit the Raiders, who will be looking to again play the role of spoiler in a battle of the AFC's two most penalized teams.
Baltimore (8-7) came into Pittsburgh last Sunday off two victories in which it outscored Detroit and Chicago 79-10, and a season sweep of the Steelers would have put the Ravens in the playoffs.
But they committed 11 penalties that cost them 113 yards and two touchdowns, and Derrick Mason dropped a sure TD in the fourth quarter, all leading to a 23-20 loss.
"Forget about this one. It's over and done with," Mason said. "We just have to prepare for the next one. That's all that matters. We win, we're in. That's our philosophy. I've forgotten about this one; it's done and over with."
While a win against the Raiders (5-10) puts the Ravens in, a loss would eliminate them.
Mason surpassed 1,000 yards for the third straight season, but Baltimore cracked the 1,000-yard barrier in a less glamorous category - penalty yardage. Penalties have cost the Ravens an NFL-high 1,057 yards, and with 11 more yards lost against Oakland they'll break the franchise record.
"It was irritating. All of us felt that," coach John Harbaugh said. "We played too well in so many ways for the outcome to be what it was. Why was the outcome what it was? Well, it was our doing. It was penalties and missed opportunities. But those are things we can fix."
The Raiders are no strangers to penalties hurting their cause. Oakland has been flagged 36 times for 306 yards over the past three weeks to raise its total to an AFC-high 112.
Charlie Frye threw three interceptions, two players were ejected and 13 penalties cost the Raiders a season-high 126 yards last Sunday in Cleveland. Oakland lost 23-9 despite outgaining the Browns by more than 100 yards.
"I've never seen flags thrown like that," said Pro Bowl defensive lineman Richard Seymour, who was called for two personal fouls on one play. "It was so ticky-tack. Obviously we have to understand how the game is being played and how the game is being called and play accordingly. We didn't do a good job of that after we understood that they were going to throw it if you looked the wrong way."
The Raiders have given two of the Ravens' AFC North rivals fits this season. Bruce Gradkowski engineered a comeback in the final 2 minutes to beat division-champion Cincinnati 20-17 on Nov. 22, then threw three fourth-quarter TDs - each putting Oakland ahead - in a 27-24 win at Pittsburgh on Dec. 6.
Gradkowski, however, partially tore the MCL in his right knee a week later, and Frye has compiled a 49.2 passer rating in two starts since. Gradkowski is listed as doubtful for Sunday and former No. 1 overall pick JaMarcus Russell appears relegated to the bench.
Frye, who threw for 333 yards last week, has experience facing Baltimore. He posted an 80.5 rating with two TDs and two interceptions in a pair of starts against the Ravens with Cleveland in 2006.
Baltimore's banged-up secondary is without cornerbacks Fabian Washington and Ladarius Webb - both lost for the season - and All-Pro safety Ed Reed hasn't played since Nov. 29 with a slight tear in his groin.
Reed is listed as a game-time decision but isn't expected to play.
Joe Flacco has thrown seven touchdown passes - four to tight end Todd Heap - and one interception over the past three weeks, but the Ravens will likely spend much of their time looking to exploit Oakland's 29th-ranked rush defense.
Though the Raiders have held their opponents to 3.4 yards per carry over their past three games, they'll have their hands full with Ray Rice. The second-year back topped 100 yards rushing for the second time in three weeks with 141 against the Steelers, and he also has a team-high 74 receptions - two more than Mason.
Rice is second behind Tennessee's Chris Johnson with 1,952 yards from scrimmage.
"Ray gets better all the time," Harbaugh said. "He's taken a lot of reps throughout the course of the season, so to me, Ray's just getting stronger as the season goes on."
In Harbaugh's two seasons at the helm, Baltimore hasn't lost to a sub-.500 team. That included a 29-10 home victory over Oakland on Oct. 26, 2008, in which Rice had 155 all-purpose yards.
The Ravens have visited Oakland twice, winning only in the AFC championship game after the 2000 season en route to the franchise's only Super Bowl title.
For now, they're just trying to get in.
"We've got an opportunity to get in the tournament," Harbaugh said. "To me, that's motivation enough. I'm sure our guys will be ready."
Game Notes: If nothing else, Oakland’s improved play in recent weeks has given the franchise something to build on moving forward. A playoff-spoiling victory in the season finale vs. Baltimore would be another nice shot in the arm. Wins over the Ravens have come few and far between though for Oakland, as it is just 1-5 SU & ATS since ’96 in the head-to-head series, scoring 10.5 PPG. The Raiders are 15-29 ATS as a home dog as well, and 1-5 SU & ATS in their L6 home finales. Baltimore puts its playoff hopes on the line for a 4th straight week, looking to advance its record to 7-0 SU & ATS as a double-digit favorite under John Harbaugh. His club has also covered the spread in nine straight games vs. teams with a losing record, winning by a whopping 32.2-9.2 average margin. |
|
|
|
Play Against - Road favorites (BALTIMORE) - good rushing team - averaging 130 or more rushing yards/game, after outrushing opponent by 100 or more yards last game.
(106-64 since 1983.) (62.4%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play On - Road teams (BALTIMORE) - good rushing team (125 to 150 RY/game) against an average rushing team (95-125 RY/game).
(61-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +21.4 units. Rating = 1*) | Play On - Road teams (BALTIMORE) - off a road loss, in the last 2 weeks of the regular season.
(33-12 over the last 10 seasons.) (73.3%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play On - Road teams (BALTIMORE) - off a road loss, in the second half of the season.
(73-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.4%, +32.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Over - Any team against the total (BALTIMORE) - off an extremely close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(75-39 since 1983.) (65.8%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Any team against the total (BALTIMORE) - off an extremely close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival, in the last 4 weeks of the regular season.
(78-39 since 1983.) (66.7%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BALTIMORE | 23 | | 23 | | 27-127 | 4.6 | 32-228 | 7.1 | 59-355 | 6.0 | 1-1 | | OAKLAND | 13 | | 17 | | 27-112 | 4.1 | 33-167 | 5.1 | 60-279 | 4.7 | 1-1 |
| | StatFox.Com has searched its database for all past games where the posted line or total were similar to this game's and where the final game statistics were comparable to the estimator's projections. (Yards/Play and turnovers) Here are the results against the spread, against the total, and straight up: | In past games, the underdog covered the spread 12 times, while the favorite covered the spread 10 times.
No Edge. | | In past games, the favorite won the game straight up 19 times, while the underdog won straight up 3 times. | 43 games went under the total, while 41 games went over the total.
No Edge. |
|
|
|
Potential StatFox Power Trends to watch out for:
|
|
OAKLAND is 14-36 ATS (-25.6 Units) when they gain 250 to 300 total yards since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 15.4, OPPONENT 22.3 | OAKLAND is 6-17 ATS (-12.7 Units) when they are outgained by their opponents by 50-100 yards since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 17.3, OPPONENT 26.5 | OAKLAND is 12-26 ATS (-16.6 Units) when they gain 4.5 to 5 total yards per play since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 18.0, OPPONENT 22.2 | OAKLAND is 4-15 ATS (-12.5 Units) when they're outgained by opponents by 1 to 1.5 yards/play since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 16.9, OPPONENT 27.4 | OAKLAND is 25-46 ATS (-25.6 Units) when they allow 22 to 28 points since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 19.7, OPPONENT 24.8 | OAKLAND is 2-11 ATS (-10.1 Units) in home games when they allow 7 to 7.5 net passing yards/attempt since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 15.6, OPPONENT 28.6 | OAKLAND is 15-32 ATS (-20.2 Units) when they allow 125 to 150 rushing yards since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 19.4, OPPONENT 25.1 | OAKLAND is 13-35 ATS (-25.5 Units) when they rush for 100 to 125 yards since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 20.2, OPPONENT 25.0 |
|
BALTIMORE is 34-15 OVER (+17.5 Units) when they gain 350 to 400 total yards since 1992.
The average score was BALTIMORE 24.3, OPPONENT 20.0 | BALTIMORE is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) when they gain 6 to 6.5 total yards per play over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was BALTIMORE 29.2, OPPONENT 18.5 | BALTIMORE is 32-10 OVER (+21.0 Units) when they gain 6 or more total yards per play since 1992.
The average score was BALTIMORE 28.3, OPPONENT 21.3 | BALTIMORE is 31-15 OVER (+14.5 Units) when they score 22 to 28 points since 1992.
The average score was BALTIMORE 25.3, OPPONENT 17.2 | OAKLAND is 45-16 OVER (+27.4 Units) when they allow 6 or more total yards per play since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 22.4, OPPONENT 28.6 | OAKLAND is 21-8 OVER (+12.2 Units) in home games when they rush for 100 to 125 yards since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 20.8, OPPONENT 25.4 |
|
BALTIMORE is 30-14 UNDER (+14.6 Units) when they allow 15 to 21 points since 1992.
The average score was BALTIMORE 16.0, OPPONENT 18.6 | OAKLAND is 41-21 UNDER (+17.9 Units) when they gain 150 to 200 net passing yards since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 16.6, OPPONENT 20.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALTIMORE is 9-0 ATS (+9.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was BALTIMORE 32.2, OPPONENT 9.2 - (Rating = 4*) | BALTIMORE is 6-0 ATS (+6.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record in the second half of the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was BALTIMORE 32.8, OPPONENT 5.5 - (Rating = 1*) | OAKLAND is 17-34 ATS (-20.4 Units) versus good rushing teams - averaging >=4.5 rushing yards/carry since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 19.8, OPPONENT 25.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
BALTIMORE is 17-6 UNDER (+10.4 Units) in road games vs. poor kickoff coverage teams, allowing >= 24 yards per return since 1992.
The average score was BALTIMORE 15.0, OPPONENT 18.9 - (Rating = 1*) | OAKLAND is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - averaging >=5.65 yards/play over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was OAKLAND 13.6, OPPONENT 24.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALTIMORE is 6-0 ATS (+6.0 Units) as a favorite of 10 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was BALTIMORE 32.3, OPPONENT 7.3 - (Rating = 1*) | BALTIMORE is 22-11 ATS (+9.9 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was BALTIMORE 23.8, OPPONENT 15.7 - (Rating = 1*) | BALTIMORE is 19-8 ATS (+10.2 Units) in games played on a grass field over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was BALTIMORE 24.3, OPPONENT 14.3 - (Rating = 1*) | BALTIMORE is 6-0 ATS (+6.0 Units) after gaining 175 or more rushing yards last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was BALTIMORE 32.5, OPPONENT 15.0 - (Rating = 1*) | BALTIMORE is 6-0 ATS (+6.0 Units) after outrushing opponent by 100 or more yards last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was BALTIMORE 32.5, OPPONENT 15.0 - (Rating = 1*) | BALTIMORE is 22-11 ATS (+9.9 Units) in all lined games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was BALTIMORE 23.8, OPPONENT 15.7 - (Rating = 1*) | BALTIMORE is 13-4 ATS (+8.6 Units) as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was BALTIMORE 26.6, OPPONENT 9.6 - (Rating = 1*) | BALTIMORE is 15-4 ATS (+10.6 Units) in all games where the total is between 35.5 and 42 points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was BALTIMORE 26.6, OPPONENT 14.4 - (Rating = 2*) | OAKLAND is 20-35 ATS (-18.5 Units) in home games off a road loss since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 20.8, OPPONENT 20.7 - (Rating = 0*) | OAKLAND is 29-49 ATS (-24.9 Units) in home games after playing their last game on the road since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 22.1, OPPONENT 21.2 - (Rating = 0*) | OAKLAND is 19-40 ATS (-25.0 Units) in the last 4 weeks of the regular season since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 18.0, OPPONENT 23.8 - (Rating = 1*) | OAKLAND is 75-104 ATS (-39.4 Units) after the first month of the season since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 19.6, OPPONENT 22.4 - (Rating = 0*) | OAKLAND is 48-79 ATS (-38.9 Units) in the second half of the season since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 19.6, OPPONENT 23.0 - (Rating = 1*) | OAKLAND is 15-29 ATS (-16.9 Units) as a home underdog since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 15.8, OPPONENT 24.3 - (Rating = 0*) | OAKLAND is 7-19 ATS (-13.9 Units) in a home game where the total is between 35.5 and 38 points since 1992.
The average score was OAKLAND 17.0, OPPONENT 19.0 - (Rating = 1*) | OAKLAND is 4-14 ATS (-11.4 Units) in a home game where the total is between 35.5 and 42 points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was OAKLAND 14.7, OPPONENT 23.7 - (Rating = 1*) | OAKLAND is 4-13 ATS (-10.3 Units) after having lost 2 out of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was OAKLAND 12.2, OPPONENT 28.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
BALTIMORE is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) in road games off an extremely close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival since 1992.
The average score was BALTIMORE 26.3, OPPONENT 29.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
BALTIMORE is 39-23 UNDER (+13.7 Units) in road games off 1 or more consecutive unders since 1992.
The average score was BALTIMORE 17.1, OPPONENT 18.8 - (Rating = 0*) | OAKLAND is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was OAKLAND 15.2, OPPONENT 22.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 8-7 | -2.6 | 8-6 | 6-8 | 24.7 | 9.6 | 352.6 | (5.7) | 1.5 | 16.5 | 9.5 | 298.9 | (5) | 2.0 | | Road Games | 2-5 | -3.5 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 20.0 | 5.9 | 302.7 | (5.2) | 1.7 | 21.9 | 14.4 | 340.6 | (5.4) | 1.6 | | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 33.0 | 14.7 | 405.7 | (6.4) | 1.7 | 11.0 | 10.0 | 245.0 | (4) | 3.3 | | Grass Games | 8-4 | +1 | 7-4 | 4-7 | 25.9 | 11.2 | 355.2 | (5.7) | 1.5 | 14.2 | 7.8 | 280.7 | (4.8) | 2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 24.7 | 9.6 | 20.3 | 29:41 | 29-131 | (4.6) | 21-33 | 63.1% | 222 | (6.8) | 62-353 | (5.7) | (14.3) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 21 | 10.3 | 18.6 | 30:46 | 27-113 | (4.2) | 20-34 | 60.2% | 219 | (6.5) | 60-332 | (5.5) | (15.8) | | Offense Road Games | 20.0 | 5.9 | 19.0 | 26:49 | 26-108 | (4.2) | 19-33 | 57.6% | 195 | (5.9) | 58-303 | (5.2) | (15.1) | | Defense (All Games) | 16.5 | 9.5 | 17.3 | 30:52 | 28-96 | (3.5) | 19-32 | 57.5% | 203 | (6.3) | 60-299 | (5) | (18.1) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 21.8 | 11.7 | 19 | 31:49 | 28-112 | (4) | 20-33 | 61.2% | 222 | (6.7) | 61-334 | (5.5) | (15.3) | | Defense Road Games | 21.9 | 14.4 | 19.6 | 33:11 | 28-97 | (3.4) | 20-35 | 58.8% | 244 | (7) | 63-341 | (5.4) | (15.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stats For (All Games) | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 13-6 | 41.5% | 1-0 | 46.2% | 4-94 | (25.6) | 2-17 | (6.9) | 7-80 | | Opponents Avg. Stats Against | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 2 | 13-5 | 38.8% | 1-0 | 48.1% | 4-94 | (23.1) | 20-2 | (8.8) | 6-61 | | Stats For (Road Games) | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.7 | -0.1 | 13-5 | 38.6% | 1-0 | 0.0% | 5-122 | (25) | 2-8 | (4.4) | 8-80 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 1.4 | 0.6 | 2.0 | | 14-5 | 36.1% | 1-0 | 41.2% | 5-101 | (20.5) | 2-19 | (7.8) | 6-61 | | Opponents Avg. Stats For | 1 | 0.6 | 1.6 | | 14-5 | 39.3% | 1-0 | 49.5% | 4-93 | (22.7) | 22-2 | (9.3) | 6-80 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.6 | | 14-6 | 40.0% | 1-0 | 50.0% | 4-81 | (21.9) | 3-17 | (6.1) | 7-61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 5-10 | +6 | 7-8 | 7-8 | 12.3 | 6.9 | 262.2 | (4.7) | 2.1 | 23.9 | 14.8 | 364.1 | (5.9) | 1.3 | | Home Games | 2-5 | +2.7 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 11.3 | 7.1 | 266.4 | (4.7) | 2.6 | 23.0 | 13.9 | 340.0 | (5.4) | 1.6 | | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | +3.2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 14.0 | 10.7 | 319.7 | (5.2) | 2.0 | 25.3 | 13.3 | 304.7 | (5.1) | 0.7 | | Grass Games | 5-9 | +7 | 7-7 | 7-7 | 12.6 | 7.4 | 259.1 | (4.7) | 2.1 | 23.9 | 14.6 | 354.8 | (5.7) | 1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 12.3 | 6.9 | 14.3 | 28:02 | 26-110 | (4.2) | 15-30 | 51.1% | 152 | (5.1) | 56-262 | (4.7) | (21.4) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 20.8 | 10.5 | 18.3 | 30:05 | 27-117 | (4.2) | 20-33 | 59.6% | 208 | (6.3) | 60-324 | (5.4) | (15.6) | | Offense Home Games | 11.3 | 7.1 | 14.4 | 28:11 | 27-117 | (4.4) | 16-30 | 51.7% | 150 | (5) | 57-266 | (4.7) | (23.6) | | Defense (All Games) | 23.9 | 14.8 | 19.9 | 31:58 | 34-150 | (4.4) | 17-28 | 59.3% | 214 | (7.7) | 62-364 | (5.9) | (15.3) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 21.8 | 11 | 18.7 | 30:26 | 28-113 | (4) | 20-33 | 61.0% | 224 | (6.9) | 61-337 | (5.6) | (15.5) | | Defense Home Games | 23.0 | 13.9 | 19.7 | 31:49 | 34-152 | (4.5) | 17-29 | 57.4% | 188 | (6.5) | 63-340 | (5.4) | (14.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stats For (All Games) | 1.1 | 0.9 | 2.1 | -0.7 | 13-4 | 28.5% | 1-1 | 47.6% | 4-77 | (18.3) | 2-13 | (5.5) | 7-51 | | Opponents Avg. Stats Against | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 2 | 13-5 | 37.5% | 1-1 | 48.8% | 4-92 | (22.3) | 18-2 | (8.4) | 6-39 | | Stats For (Home Games) | 1.7 | 0.9 | 2.6 | -1.0 | 13-4 | 31.5% | 1-1 | 44.4% | 4-71 | (17.9) | 3-16 | (5.9) | 6-51 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.3 | | 13-5 | 35.3% | 1-1 | 64.3% | 3-63 | (24.7) | 4-29 | (7) | 5-39 | | Opponents Avg. Stats For | 1 | 0.7 | 1.7 | | 13-5 | 37.3% | 1-1 | 50.8% | 4-87 | (22.2) | 22-2 | (9.3) | 6-51 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 0.4 | 1.1 | 1.6 | | 14-5 | 34.7% | 1-1 | 62.5% | 3-70 | (24.4) | 3-20 | (6) | 6-39 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: BALTIMORE 20.1, OAKLAND 21.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11/8/2009 | @ CINCINNATI | 7-17 | L | -3 | L | 45 | U | 17-55 | 18-32-160 | 2 | 39-146 | 20-33-223 | 1 | | 11/16/2009 | @ CLEVELAND | 16-0 | W | -11 | W | 39.5 | U | 36-134 | 13-19-140 | 0 | 26-86 | 13-31-74 | 2 | | 11/22/2009 | INDIANAPOLIS | 15-17 | L | 1 | L | 44.5 | U | 31-98 | 23-35-256 | 2 | 25-76 | 22-31-299 | 3 | | 11/29/2009 | PITTSBURGH | 20-17 | W | -7.5 | L | 34.5 | O | 29-132 | 23-35-261 | 2 | 38-153 | 12-26-145 | 1 | | 12/7/2009 | @ GREEN BAY | 14-27 | L | 4 | L | 43 | U | 21-66 | 15-36-119 | 4 | 27-94 | 26-40-256 | 3 | | 12/13/2009 | DETROIT | 48-3 | W | -14 | W | 40.5 | O | 40-308 | 15-23-240 | 1 | 32-103 | 16-34-126 | 2 | | 12/20/2009 | CHICAGO | 31-7 | W | -10.5 | W | 39.5 | U | 31-124 | 23-33-222 | 1 | 30-122 | 12-32-98 | 6 | | 12/27/2009 | @ PITTSBURGH | 20-23 | L | 3 | T | 43 | P | 38-175 | 13-25-148 | 3 | 23-48 | 17-33-238 | 2 | | 1/3/2010 | @ OAKLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11/15/2009 | KANSAS CITY | 10-16 | L | -3 | L | 36.5 | U | 30-182 | 13-32-90 | 2 | 31-112 | 19-34-206 | 3 | | 11/22/2009 | CINCINNATI | 20-17 | W | 8.5 | W | 36 | O | 24-92 | 17-34-183 | 3 | 43-177 | 14-22-171 | 4 | | 11/26/2009 | @ DALLAS | 7-24 | L | 13.5 | L | 40.5 | U | 24-124 | 18-35-181 | 1 | 25-195 | 18-29-299 | 0 | | 12/6/2009 | @ PITTSBURGH | 27-24 | W | 15 | W | 37 | O | 28-109 | 20-34-287 | 0 | 27-132 | 18-24-269 | 1 | | 12/13/2009 | WASHINGTON | 13-34 | L | 2.5 | L | 37 | O | 24-65 | 20-34-162 | 1 | 27-100 | 16-28-195 | 1 | | 12/20/2009 | @ DENVER | 20-19 | W | 13.5 | W | 37 | O | 34-241 | 14-29-102 | 2 | 28-80 | 19-34-257 | 0 | | 12/27/2009 | @ CLEVELAND | 9-23 | L | 3 | L | 37 | U | 19-88 | 26-45-301 | 3 | 46-164 | 8-17-118 | 1 | | 1/3/2010 | BALTIMORE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| BALTIMORE is 5-1 against the spread versus OAKLAND since 1992 | | BALTIMORE is 5-1 straight up against OAKLAND since 1992 | | 4 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1992 |
| |
| BALTIMORE is 1-0 against the spread versus OAKLAND over the last 3 seasons | | BALTIMORE is 1-0 straight up against OAKLAND over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| OAKLAND is 1-1 against the spread versus BALTIMORE since 1992 | | OAKLAND is 1-1 straight up against BALTIMORE since 1992 | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1992 |
| |
| There were no past matchups in this series during this time period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10/26/2008 | OAKLAND | 10 | 34.5 | Over | 0 | 10 | 23:40 | 19-47 | 15-33 | 187 | 0 | 1 | 2-10 | | | BALTIMORE | 29 | -8 | SU ATS | 19 | 18 | 36:20 | 46-192 | 13-25 | 183 | 1 | 0 | 8-52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harbaugh is 6-0 ATS (+6.0 Units) as a favorite of 10 or more points as the coach of BALTIMORE.
The average score was BALTIMORE 32.3, OPPONENT 7.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Harbaugh is 22-11 ATS (+9.9 Units) in all games as the coach of BALTIMORE.
The average score was BALTIMORE 23.8, OPPONENT 15.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Harbaugh is 22-11 ATS (+9.9 Units) in all lined games as the coach of BALTIMORE.
The average score was BALTIMORE 23.8, OPPONENT 15.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Harbaugh is 13-4 ATS (+8.6 Units) as a favorite as the coach of BALTIMORE.
The average score was BALTIMORE 26.6, OPPONENT 9.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Harbaugh is 15-4 ATS (+10.6 Units) in all games where the total is between 35.5 and 42 points as the coach of BALTIMORE.
The average score was BALTIMORE 26.6, OPPONENT 14.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Harbaugh is 19-8 ATS (+10.2 Units) in games played on a grass field as the coach of BALTIMORE.
The average score was BALTIMORE 24.3, OPPONENT 14.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Harbaugh is 6-0 ATS (+6.0 Units) after gaining 175 or more rushing yards last game as the coach of BALTIMORE.
The average score was BALTIMORE 32.5, OPPONENT 15.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Harbaugh is 6-0 ATS (+6.0 Units) after outrushing opponent by 100 or more yards last game as the coach of BALTIMORE.
The average score was BALTIMORE 32.5, OPPONENT 15.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Harbaugh is 9-0 ATS (+9.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of BALTIMORE.
The average score was BALTIMORE 32.2, OPPONENT 9.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Harbaugh is 6-0 ATS (+6.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record in the second half of the season as the coach of BALTIMORE.
The average score was BALTIMORE 32.8, OPPONENT 5.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cable is 4-12 ATS (-9.2 Units) after having lost 2 out of their last 3 games as the coach of OAKLAND.
The average score was OAKLAND 11.8, OPPONENT 28.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Cable is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - averaging >=5.65 yards/play as the coach of OAKLAND.
The average score was OAKLAND 13.3, OPPONENT 24.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Since 1992, the home underdog has covered the spread 25 times, while the road favorite covered the spread 15 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog has covered the spread 6 times, while the road favorite covered the spread 3 times. | | Since 1992, the road favorite won the game straight up 29 times, while the home underdog won straight up 12 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 8 times, while the home underdog won straight up 1 times. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Since 1992, 145 games went over the total, while 138 games went under the total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 15 games went under the total, while 14 games went over the total. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Since 1992, the road favorite has covered the spread 3 times, while the home underdog covered the spread 1 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite has covered the spread 1 times, while the home underdog covered the spread 0 times. | | Since 1992, the road favorite won the game straight up 3 times, while the home underdog won straight up 1 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 1 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. | | Since 1992, 3 games went under the total, while 1 games went over the total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went under the total, while 0 games went over the total. |
|
|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in BALTIMORE games 49.4% of the time since 1992. (87-89) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in BALTIMORE games 58.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (24-17) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in OAKLAND games 58.2% of the time since 1992. (114-82) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in OAKLAND games 58.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (21-15) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in BALTIMORE games 55.9% of the time since 1992. (104-82) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in BALTIMORE games 46.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (21-24) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in OAKLAND games 51.5% of the time since 1992. (121-114) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in OAKLAND games 50% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (17-17) | |
|
|
|
|
| [OT] 08/04/2009 - Adam Terry IR ( Knee ) | | [CB] 10/19/2009 - Samari Rolle IR ( Neck ) | | [WR] 08/14/2009 - Marcus Smith IR ( ACL ) | | [DT] 08/15/2009 - Lamar Divens IR ( Hip ) | | [LB] 09/06/2009 - Jason Phillips IR ( Knee ) | | [LB] 10/05/2009 - Brendon Ayanbadejo IR ( Quad ) | | [DB] 11/17/2009 - Haruki Nakamura IR ( Ankle ) | | [RB] 11/24/2009 - Matt Lawrence IR ( Knee ) | | [CB] 11/24/2009 - Fabian Washington IR ( Knee ) | | [FS] 12/29/2009 - Ed Reed is upgraded to probable Sunday vs. Oakland ( Hip ) | | [OT] 12/27/2009 - Jared Gaither "?" Sunday vs. Oakland ( Foot ) | | [DT] 12/19/2009 - Brandon McKinney IR ( Back ) | | [S] 12/25/2009 - KJ Gerard IR ( Thigh ) | | [CB] 12/21/2009 - Lardarius Webb IR ( ACL ) | | [LB] 12/27/2009 - Tavares Gooden "?" Sunday vs. Oakland ( Groin ) | |
| [WR] 12/27/2009 - Nick Miller "?" Sunday vs. Baltimore ( Shin ) | | [LB] 11/22/2009 - Ricky Brown IR ( Ankle ) | | [LB] 11/26/2009 - Jon Alston IR ( Concussion ) | | [WR] 12/27/2009 - Darrius Heyward-Bey "?" Sunday vs. Baltimore ( Foot ) | | [OG] 12/14/2009 - Robert Gallery IR ( Back ) | | [QB] 12/28/2009 - Bruce Gradkowski is downgraded to doubtful Sunday vs. Baltimore ( Knee ) | | [TE] 12/27/2009 - Brandon Myers "?" Sunday vs. Baltimore ( Concussion ) | | [RB] 12/27/2009 - Justin Fargas "?" Sunday vs. Baltimore ( Knee ) | | [RB] 12/24/2009 - Luke Lawton out for season ( Suspension ) | | [OG] 12/27/2009 - Langston Walker injured last game, "?" Sunday vs. Baltimore ( Leg ) | | [QB] 12/28/2009 - Charlie Frye expected to start Sunday vs. Baltimore ( None ) |
|
|
|
| Last Updated: 2/9/2010 1:28:26 AM EST |
|
|
BETTING TRENDS
