|
|
| Friday 11/13/2009 | Line | $ Line | OU Line | Score | TORONTO
CHICAGO |
|
|
6
| 2
Final
3 |
|
|
|
| TORONTO (3-9-0-4, 10 pts.) at CHICAGO (10-5-0-2, 22 pts.) | |
|
|
|
 | |
| 61 | TORONTO | +175 | | 62 | CHICAGO | -210 |
|
|
|  |
|
|
|
|
| One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. Boasting a giant sports bettor customer base, Sportsbook is able to present data that is accurately reflective of public sentiment. This beats other sources that may be mixing sharp AND public opinion, have a much smaller customer base, or simply presenting the opinions of contest players, not bettors. The Betting Trends from Sportsbook show what percentage of bets are on each side of the pointspread or total. The results can be especially valuable in high profile games. This data can be used to profit from. When given the choice, most professional bettors would choose to be on the side of the "house", or that opposite of the betting public. Alternatively, others believe in the theory that there is "strength in numbers". Neither belief is foolproof, but if you follow these Betting Trends for long enough, you’ll surely form your own opinion. |
|
|
| TORONTO |  (0%) | CHICAGO | (100%) |
|  | |
| Last Updated: 11/21/2009 2:46:15 AM EST | 
|
|
|
|
|
| There are StatFox Super Money Line Situations with records of significance that apply to this game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TORONTO | TOSKALA | 2.2 | +194 | | | CHICAGO | HUET | 3.3 | -194 | |
|
|
|
|
|
TORONTO is 240-240 against the money line (+36.6 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record since 1996.
The average score was TORONTO 2.8, OPPONENT 2.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 182-212 against the money line (-86.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1996.
The average score was CHICAGO 2.7, OPPONENT 2.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 89-110 against the money line (-49.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record in the first half of the season since 1996.
The average score was CHICAGO 2.6, OPPONENT 2.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-15 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in home games against terrible starting goalies - saving <= 88% of shots against since 1996.
The average score was CHICAGO 2.0, OPPONENT 3.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 113-120 against the money line (-50.5 Units) against poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 0.3+ goals/game since 1996.
The average score was CHICAGO 2.7, OPPONENT 2.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 48-33 against the money line (+18.6 Units) against good passing teams - averaging 5 or more assists per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 3.4, OPPONENT 2.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TORONTO is 160-212 against the money line (+26.0 Units) as a road underdog since 1996.
The average score was TORONTO 2.7, OPPONENT 3.1 - (Rating = 0*) | TORONTO is 151-116 against the money line (+49.6 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1996.
The average score was TORONTO 3.1, OPPONENT 2.9 - (Rating = 1*) | TORONTO is 124-98 against the money line (+39.6 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1996.
The average score was TORONTO 3.1, OPPONENT 3.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TORONTO is 26-19 against the money line (+16.8 Units) in road games off a home blowout loss by 3 goals or more since 1996.
The average score was TORONTO 2.8, OPPONENT 2.5 - (Rating = 1*) | TORONTO is 67-67 against the money line (+24.5 Units) in road games after a loss by 2 goals or more in their previous game since 1996.
The average score was TORONTO 2.8, OPPONENT 3.0 - (Rating = 0*) | TORONTO is 47-40 against the money line (+23.7 Units) in road games after a blowout loss by 3 goals or more in their previous game since 1996.
The average score was TORONTO 2.9, OPPONENT 2.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TORONTO is 119-115 against the money line (+40.0 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1996.
The average score was TORONTO 2.8, OPPONENT 2.9 - (Rating = 1*) | TORONTO is 107-107 against the money line (+34.2 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1996.
The average score was TORONTO 2.8, OPPONENT 3.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 184-157 against the money line (-65.3 Units) as a favorite since 1996.
The average score was CHICAGO 2.8, OPPONENT 2.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 147-122 against the money line (-54.0 Units) as a home favorite since 1996.
The average score was CHICAGO 2.8, OPPONENT 2.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-10 against the money line (-15.6 Units) as a home favorite of -200 or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 2.7, OPPONENT 2.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 34-50 against the money line (-29.4 Units) in home games on Friday nights since 1996.
The average score was CHICAGO 2.7, OPPONENT 2.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 113-133 against the money line (-52.8 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1996.
The average score was CHICAGO 2.6, OPPONENT 2.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TORONTO is 3-13 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was TORONTO 2.6, OPPONENT 3.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TORONTO is 3-13 against the money line (-10.8 Units) first half of the season this season.
The average score was TORONTO 2.6, OPPONENT 3.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TORONTO is 0-7 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after one or more consecutive overs this season.
The average score was TORONTO 2.0, OPPONENT 4.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TORONTO is 0-8 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after allowing 4 goals or more this season.
The average score was TORONTO 1.6, OPPONENT 3.9 - (Rating = 2*) | TORONTO is 0-7 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after playing a game where 7 or more total goals were scored this season.
The average score was TORONTO 2.0, OPPONENT 4.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
|
|
|
| CHICAGO is 11-14-2 (-1.6 Units) against the money line versus TORONTO since 1996 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 2-0-0 (+2.7 Units) against the money line versus TORONTO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| TORONTO is 10-3-1 (+9.1 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1996 |
| |
| There were no past matchups in this series during this time period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11/22/2008 | CHICAGO | 5 | -125 | SU | 36 | 9 | 3-1 | KHABIBULIN | 38 | 34 | | | TORONTO | 4 | +105 | | 38 | 7 | 2-1 | TOSKALA | 36 | 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
RON WILSON is 233-238 against the money line (+14.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was RON WILSON 2.7, OPPONENT 2.7 - (Rating = 0*) | RON WILSON is 85-95 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in road games against excellent power play teams- scoring on >17.5% of their chances in all games he has coached since 1996.
The average score was RON WILSON 2.5, OPPONENT 2.8 - (Rating = 0*) | JOEL QUENNEVILLE is 8-10 against the money line (-15.6 Units) as a home favorite of -200 or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 2.7, OPPONENT 2.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
RON WILSON is 14-36 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of TORONTO.
The average score was TORONTO 2.9, OPPONENT 3.8 - (Rating = 1*) | RON WILSON is 15-34 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after allowing 4 goals or more as the coach of TORONTO.
The average score was TORONTO 2.9, OPPONENT 3.7 - (Rating = 0*) | RON WILSON is 13-35 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after playing a game where 7 or more total goals were scored as the coach of TORONTO.
The average score was TORONTO 2.9, OPPONENT 3.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
|
|
|
| [D] 10/17/2009 - Mike Van Ryn out for season ( Knee ) | | [D] 11/12/2009 - Michael Komisarek expected to miss at least 3 weeks ( Quad ) | |
| [RW] 09/23/2009 - Adam Burish expected to miss at least 5 months ( Knee ) | | [RW] 10/30/2009 - Marian Hossa out until mid November ( Shoulder ) | | [C] 11/10/2009 - Dave Bolland expected to miss 3-4 months ( Back ) |
|
|
|
| Last Updated: 11/21/2009 2:46:08 AM EST |
|
|
BETTING TRENDS
